Video Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Men's Issues
Nomination of Violence against men for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Violence against men is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence against men (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Maps Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Men's Issues
RfC: Should the WP:TALK guideline discourage interleaving?
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines#RfC: Should the guideline discourage interleaving? #2. A permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Pubic hair
Input from project members is requested to respond to this.
- Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ? ? 16:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Having a gendered category only when there's an article behind it
Please see Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Revisiting gendered categories: Let's have a clear criterion of "has or can have a proper article"
It is not a !voting proposal or RfC, but a discussion draft, and has already had some constructive feedback (e.g. leading with "ghettoization" of articles was a distraction, as were suggesting statistical differences and reasons for them without providing sources; I also didn't make it clear it also applied to male/men cateogories). Seeking input on the overall idea. -- SMcCandlish ? ¢ >??????< 02:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Having a gendered category only when there's an article behind it
Please see Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Revisiting gendered categories: Let's have a clear criterion of "has or can have a proper article"
It is not a !voting proposal or RfC, but a discussion draft, and has already had some constructive feedback (e.g. leading with "ghettoization" of articles was a distraction, as were suggesting statistical differences and reasons for them without providing sources; should've also been clearer that it applies also to male/men categories). Seeking input on the overall idea. -- SMcCandlish ? ¢ >??????< 02:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Source of article : Wikipedia
0 Comments